<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five Reasons Why Climate-Change Opposition Will Get Real Ugly.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://upalldamnnight.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=440" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://upalldamnnight.com/?p=440</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 07:32:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Graham &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Some Unexpected Support For Climate-Change Policy Reform.</title>
		<link>http://upalldamnnight.com/?p=440&#038;cpage=1#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Graham &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Some Unexpected Support For Climate-Change Policy Reform.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://upalldamnnight.com/?p=440#comment-125</guid>
		<description>[...] written before about the violent backlash I expect when climate-change policy reform becomes the White [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written before about the violent backlash I expect when climate-change policy reform becomes the White [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Graham</title>
		<link>http://upalldamnnight.com/?p=440&#038;cpage=1#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://upalldamnnight.com/?p=440#comment-97</guid>
		<description>There will be bi-partisan support for a new piece of clean-energy policy if what Sen. Graham said holds true.

It&#039;s the populist outrage over policy progression, not the process of lawmaking, that I&#039;m prediction will be a lot worse. Oil and energy companies have deep-enough pockets to lobby for anti-reform in the same way health insurers lobbied for anti-reform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There will be bi-partisan support for a new piece of clean-energy policy if what Sen. Graham said holds true.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the populist outrage over policy progression, not the process of lawmaking, that I&#8217;m prediction will be a lot worse. Oil and energy companies have deep-enough pockets to lobby for anti-reform in the same way health insurers lobbied for anti-reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGreenMiles</title>
		<link>http://upalldamnnight.com/?p=440&#038;cpage=1#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGreenMiles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 21:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://upalldamnnight.com/?p=440#comment-96</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure how the Senate clean energy &amp; climate debate could get any uglier than &quot;death panels&quot; &amp; &quot;kill Granny.&quot;

Also, how do you explain 8 House Republicans voting for clean energy &amp; climate legislation, but 0 voting for health insurance reform? Would seem to go against your argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure how the Senate clean energy &amp; climate debate could get any uglier than &#8220;death panels&#8221; &amp; &#8220;kill Granny.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also, how do you explain 8 House Republicans voting for clean energy &amp; climate legislation, but 0 voting for health insurance reform? Would seem to go against your argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
